I noted a few difference. Hard to put my thumb on exactly what they were. I felt that the prose was more archaic. I think it stems from the dialogue itself. As to the "lean" writing style, yes, he seems to be less focused on description and more on the exchange between characters.
Yeah, I thought that was a great scene. I'm enjoying the book a lot. Is it just me, or does he seems to have taken a slightly leaner approach than with the Malazan books? I mean, it's still Erikson and has all of the things I'd come to expect, but it seems more focused in some way. I love the Malazan books, but I was curious if he intentionally adopted a slightly different style.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.